← Back to case studies Get an AI Plan →

Logistics · Regional LTL & cross-dock

Fewer miles, tighter windows, happier receivers

A mid-market carrier fused TMS stops, live traffic, and dock appointment APIs into a dynamic sequencing layer—drivers got turn-by-turn that respected HOS, while planners saw which lanes leaked margin every morning.

$890KFuel & idle savings (annualized)
19%Improvement on on-time delivery
11minAvg dwell reduction per stop
2.4MStops scored in the first year

Snapshot

Who: Regional LTL network (anonymized) — 340 power units, 19 terminals.

Problem: Static routes aged by lunch; dispatchers patched with phone calls; fuel spiked whenever a bridge closed.

What we shipped: Continuous VRP-style re-optimization windows, driver tablet deltas every 15 minutes, and exception playbooks when docks slipped.

Challenge

Drivers distrusted “black box” routing after a failed pilot three years earlier. Transparency and rollback were non-negotiable.

Approach

We shadowed dispatch for six weeks, mirrored their heuristics in software, then beat them on held-out Fridays before any cutover.

Solution components

Graph builderStops, locks, HOS arcs, and appointment hard windows as constraints.
Traffic & weather feedsBlended ETA confidence bands; automatic slack insertion.
Driver UXExplains “why this order changed” in one sentence + map diff.
Finance bridgeMiles, gallons, and delay minutes pushed nightly to FP&A cubes.

Rollout timeline

Month 1 · Digital twin

Replayed 11 months of TMS history; found 7 systematic detour patterns.

Month 2 · Shadow Friday

Human dispatch vs. model side-by-side scorecards.

Months 3–4 · Live in two districts

Rollback switch always one tap away for terminal managers.

Month 6+ · Network

Dock APIs added for top 40 shippers by volume.

“Drivers stopped arguing with dispatch when the map showed the same math they were already doing in their heads—just faster.”

— VP Network Operations, anonymized carrier

Results & controls

Representative scenario for marketing purposes. Savings depend on network topology, union rules, and equipment mix.